BELL TEXTRON
D-329 BAT (Bell Advanced Tilt-rotor)
Info: advanced tilt-rotor demonstrator
Powerplant: not known
Significant date: 1984
The Bell Advanced Tilt Rotor (or BAT) was a lightweight advanced, single seat,
tilt-rotor aircraft proposed in 1984 by Bell in response to the US Army's LHX
program. The Light Helicopter Experimental (LHX) combat helicopter program
was initiated in 1983 to replace the Army's rapidly aging fleet of UH-1, OH-58A
Kiowa scout
and AH-1 Cobra light attack helicopters. At the time, as many as 6,000 helicopters
were envisioned. The Scout/Attack (SCAT) was the design driver; the utility
was to be derived from the SCAT. To fulfil the missions undertaken by the existing
fleet, different LHX models were to be equipped with a large variety of new
technologies and mission equipment packages.
A light survivable, lethal, armed
reconnaissance helicopter, the LHX combat helicopter was to have greater
capabilities, new sensors, millimeter wave radar, and other advance features
in a high visibility
cockpit. Maximum use was to made of computer-aided design of the LHX and
systems as an integrated whole.
To support the Army’s concept exploration activities, competitive preliminary
design contracts were awarded in September 1983 to the four major helicopter
firms - Bell Helicopter Textron, Sikorsky Aircraft, Boeing Vertol and Hughes
Helicopter to define specific aircraft system configurations (point designs).
Contracts were also awarded m December 1983 to define the advanced/integrated
cockpit design and architecture and demonstrate the feasibihty of a single-pilot
LHX Scout/Attack through full-mission simulations. These contracts were awarded
to the four major helicopter firms and to IBM. Boeing had not completely decided
which way they were going to go, but also had a Tilt-Rotor design in the
works.
The BAT was a small tilt-rotor aircraft demonstrator with a butterfly tail
unit. Development
of the BAT
had to
be abandoned due to new LHX requirements, especially in the matter of weight
(LHX had to be under 3150 kg). The problem with a BAT (Bell Attack Tiltrotor)
or any similar system is that, to make it aerodynamic and light enough to fly
agilely, you have to reduce it's fuselage profile considerably. This means
you cannot stuff the belly with a weapons bay, particularly on those variants
which in fact went with a single T800 turboshaft on the centerline and left
the wingtip pods empty. While you can theoretically use superior dropfire technology
weapons from these wings, the combination of stiffening for pylons (re-adding
weight and roll inertia, outboard) and the fact that clearing the proprotor
disks in anything but clean and level flight becomes somewhat 'sporty', tends
to argue against the type.
According to some observers, for reasons, never
explained, Army withdrew the original specifications and "dumbed-down" the
requirements to what a regular helicopter could do, and gave no credit performance
above that. In addition, they put in certain strictures in (which the Comanche
didn't meet, it turned out) to insure a Tilt-Rotor could not win. One possible
reason may be that they feared Bell and Boeing would team again and bid
one Tilt-Rotor that would
dominate the competition and no one else would bid. The net effect
of changing the specs also killed any chance for other advanced concepts such
as the Hughes ideas.
Within the new work frame defined by the Army, Bell continued
working on the LHX program and eventually joined McDonnell Douglas as the
SuperTeam on a helicopter type that unsuccessfully competed with Boeing and
Sikorsky's RAH-66 Comanche.
Population: not built (mock-up only)
Specs:
Take-off weight: 3620 kg
Maximum speed at 4270m: 563 km/h
Over ceiling outside
ground effect: 3050 m
Ferry range: 3890 km
Armament: 4 x Hellfire anti-tank
missiles, 4 x Stinger air-to-air missiles
Crew/passengers: 1
Sources:
-
The Secret Projects Forum: Link
1 | Link
2 | Link
3 | Link 4
- The Aviastar website
|